home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- <text id=94TT1464>
- <title>
- Oct. 24, 1994: Cinema:Oh, Forget It
- </title>
- <history>
- TIME--The Weekly Newsmagazine--1994
- Oct. 24, 1994 Boom for Whom?
- </history>
- <article>
- <source>Time Magazine</source>
- <hdr>
- ARTS & MEDIA/CINEMA, Page 76
- Oh, Forget It
- </hdr>
- <body>
- <p> Was a remake of An Affair to Remember necessary?
- </p>
- <p>By Richard Schickel
- </p>
- <p> Handsome couple, swell clothes, upper-crust settings, smart,
- sexually sparring dialogue and a plot device that contrives
- to keep the pair apart until you think you--and they--are
- about to burst. It worked in 1939. It worked in 1957, when it
- was retitled An Affair to Remember. It even worked last year
- when it was extensively quoted in Sleepless in Seattle. How
- is it, then, that Love Affair doesn't work in 1994?
- </p>
- <p> Probably because it's been postmodernized. Previously Terry
- (Annette Bening in the new version) was a virgin, perkily defending
- that status while the threat to her innocence, Mike the Playboy
- (Warren Beatty), was shadowed by Catholic guilt about his careless
- ways. (Remember those poignant visits to his wise old auntie's
- chapel?) These scruples served two functions: they heated up
- forbidden desires, and they gave a certain bent logic to the
- three-month hiatus the couple imposed on their affair, ostensibly
- to shed other commitments, really for the chaste contemplation
- of this one's radical implications.
- </p>
- <p> You can see why Beatty (who produced the film and co-wrote it
- with Robert Towne) was drawn to this story; for a famous womanizer,
- it must have emotionally autobiographical elements. But he also
- recognized that maidenly virtue and religiously inspired guilt
- are tough sells these days. Under Glenn Gordon Caron's uninflected
- direction, there are no chapels (though a distressingly feeble
- Katharine Hepburn appears as the aunt), the couple consummates
- quickly, and the 90-day wait for their famous date atop the
- Empire State Building is motivated by no more than a postcoital
- fear of rushing into something. Not much suspense in that. Some
- of us religious and romantic skeptics have always thought this
- was a loathsomely pious and sentimental tale, but in a way we
- were wrong. Shorn of those qualities, it just dries up and blows
- away.
- </p>
- </body>
- </article>
- </text>
-
-